My Response to “New Rules on Vaccine Exemptions Sought” Take 2

This was from a few years ago and needed to be fixed. I’ll gnaw on it for the next few days and whip it into shape.

I don’t understand why our government is determined to finish off the vaccine-injured. I lost it all thanks to these toxic shots.

My children, my body, my financial future, that free pass to medical school in ’76… I could go on and on–all lost because of these very toxic shots.

These are nothing more than toxic shots laced with viral particles to legitimize them as vaccines. If you could go back and be a fly on the walls of my family’s lives, you would understand how devastating these things are to the human life.

Salem News’s article, “New Rules on Vaccine Exemptions Sought”

https://www.salemnews.com/news/local_news/new-rules-on-vaccine-exemptions-sought/article_302e0362-1e40-56c3-b372-7ca8a0abcfec.html

is nothing more than a balm for public consumption.  In no way does it reveal the devastating impact these bills will have if passed into law.  Managing Editor Cheryl Richardson is aware that Industry is marching around the country—and even the world—rewriting our Laws to promote profit.

A brilliant young woman defines these laws well with her article:

New Draconian Bills in Massachusetts

https://mafreedomcoalition.org/blog/f/new-draconian-bills-in-massachusetts

“1.) 2548 (https://malegislature.gov/Bills/191/SD2548) and it’s companion bill HD. 4470 (https://malegislature.gov/Bills/191/HD4470) were filed on September 4, 2019 and they are worthy of uprising!

These bills promote the fallacy of “Herd Immunity” with the meaning put forth in the bills, as “Community Immunity.” Both of these theoretical concepts do not justify stricter vaccination policies and are unattainable in the real world

This is no longer just about vaccination and whether one is for or against, pro-choice or selective. These bills will leave us all at the mercy of the State. These bills violate human rights, civil liberties, civil rights, constitutional rights, and parental rights.  As such they should elicit a response from every person in Massachusetts. These bills are a stepping stone to mandatory vaccination for all, set to be accomplished through a seemingly endless and increasing vaccination schedule. With these bills, the sponsors are spelling out, line-by-line, the means to get it done. 

SD.2548 & HD. 4470 aim to:

  • Allow “health care providers,” regardless of parental consent and religious views, to determine if a minor is capable of informed consent to receive a vaccine(s), or determine if administering a vaccine(s) is in the child’s best interest, and administer said vaccine(s); after which the “health care provider” cannot be subject to disciplinary action or liable for civil damages or subject to a criminal penalty for administering said vaccine(s).
  • Gives the Health “Department” full and unchecked authority, free of regulatory guidelines, void of any concern for religious freedom, to approve or deny a religious exemption form. The Health Department will be required to review and approve or deny exemptions yearly. In the event a region has too high a number of exemptions, the Health Department is given unchecked authority to create new and stricter regulations to restore or establish “herd immunity rates”.
  • Give authority to those non-health officials that run a “covered program” –which is a program at a public or private school or recreational camp–including those open to homeschoolers—which could involve additional vaccines (not on the Massachusetts vaccination schedule), such as the Flu, HPV, and more, being administered to your child.
  • Require that parents or adult attending higher education sign a legally binding form upon obtaining a religious exemption which states that (a) refusing to immunize the participant may result in serious illness or death of the participant (although the same risk is true if one receives a vaccine as Congress has legally classified vaccines as “Unavoidably Unsafe” and can and do cause injury and death); and that (b) refusing to immunize the participant is against public health policy and may result in serious illness or death of others. However, since herd immunity through vaccination is not proven, and unvaccinated children cannot spread disease they do not have, unvaccinated children are never unequivocally responsible for the injury and death of others in the event of an outbreak or if another contracts a “vaccine preventable” disease. Therefore, one should not be required to sign a document that acknowledges flawed health policy which makes false implications!
  • Require that health care providers sign religious exemption forms, which are reported and tracked by the state. Many doctors will refuse and fire their patients. Doctors that sign too many forms will be singled out.
  • Require that health care providers offer extensive documentation when issuing medical exemptions, which will be reported and tracked by the state and will include a checklist of generally accepted contraindications to immunizations.

The Health Department “will have exclusive authority to approve or deny exemption applications” if they do not fall under a generally accepted list of CDC contraindications that justify exemption. However, since we are not all biologically the same, how can this one-size-fits all approach to medicine be fair and just? Vaccines are medical procedures with potential to do harm to some individuals. There has never been proper and necessary research conducted to screen children ahead of time to avoid vaccine injury. Certain people have epigenetic factors that put them at risk for vaccine injury, which are currently unknown. Vaccines are not tested against a control group with a saline injection placebo and therefore the full list of chronic conditions and diseases that are caused by vaccines does not exist. There is huge potential with these bills, to wreck havoc on the medical community in that doctors will likely be targeted for issuing medical exemptions that fall outside of CDC guidelines, even when looking out for their patient’s best interest. 

These bills are designed to “weed out the non-conformers” and they expose a militant effort that will provide the state with totalitarian control over vaccination – essentially mandating vaccines for all school children (public, private or charter), higher education students (colleges, universities, trade-schools), and some homeschoolers. This bill is a stepping stone to amend the bill to include homeschoolers and adults, measures deemed necessary, theoretically, to achieve “Community Immunity.”

The bills will likely be heard by a Committee sometime this fall and if passed they are set to go into effect in July of 2020.””

These bills strip “parental consent,” cement indemnification from civil liability (Federal Act H.R. 5546, put in place by the 99th Congress in 1986 lays the bed for this,) and even eliminates criminal liability.  It invents the necessity of adult mandates through the establishment of herd-immunity rates.  If these shots are safe and effective, why are these measures necessary?

The Supreme Court of the US stated clearly that these shots are “unavoidably unsafe.”

Read the full case: https://rb.gy/vousok

Notes from the Bruesewitz v. Wyeth case:

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA or Act) created a no-fault compensation program to stabilize a vaccine market adversely affected by an increase in vaccine-related tort litigation and to facilitate compensation to claimants who found pursuing legitimate vaccine-inflicted injuries too costly and difficult. The Act provides that a party alleging a vaccine-related injury may file a petition for compensation in the Court of Federal Claims, naming the
Health and Human Services Secretary as the respondent; that the court must resolve the case by a specified deadline; and that the claimant can then decide whether to accept the court’s judgment or reject it and seek tort relief from the vaccine manufacturer. Awards are paid out of a fund created by an excise tax on each vaccine dose.
As a quid pro quo, manufacturers enjoy significant tort-liability protections. Most importantly, the Act eliminates manufacturer liability for a vaccine’s unavoidable, adverse side effects.
Hannah Bruesewitz’s parents filed a vaccine-injury petition in the Court of Federal Claims, claiming that Hannah became disabled after receiving a diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTP) vaccine nanufactured by Lederle Laboratories (now owned by respondent Wyeth). After that court denied their claim, they elected to reject the unfavorable judgment and filed suit in Pennsylvania state court, alleging, inter alia, that the defective design of Lederle’s DTP vaccine caused Hannah’s disabilities, and that Lederle was subject to strict liability and liability for negligent design under Pennsylvania common law. Wyeth removed the suit to the Federal District Court. It granted Wyeth summary judgment, holding that the relevant Pennsylvania law was preempted by 42 U. S. C. §300aa–22(b), which provides that “no vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side-effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.” The Third Circuit affirmed.

Read the entire case for yourself here: https://rb.gy/vousok

A top research scientist at MIT, Dr. Stephanie Seneff, has exposed the fact that glyphosate (the main ingredient in Roundup) is in most of these shots.

“Dr. Stephanie Seneff is a Senior Research Scientist at MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory in Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. She has a BS degree from MIT in biology and MS, EE and PhD degrees from MIT in electrical engineering and computer science.  She has published over 200 peer-reviewed papers in scientific journals and conference proceedings. Her recent interests have focused on the role of toxic chemicals and micronutrient deficiencies in health and disease, with a special emphasis on the pervasive herbicide, Roundup, and the mineral, sulfur.  She has authored over thirty peer-reviewed journal papers over the past few years on these topics, and has delivered numerous slide presentations around the world.”

Weeding Out Vaccine Toxins: MMR, Glyphosate, and the Health of a Generation

By Dr. Stephanie Seneff

“In a series of articles, my colleague Anthony Samsel and I have been exploring the connection between glyphosate and a number of diseases, including multiple sclerosis, autism, Alzheimer’s disease, and cancer. In our most recent article, “Glyphosate Pathways to Modern Diseases VI: Prions, Amyloidoses and Autoimmune Neurological Diseases,” we present evidence that glyphosate has made its way into several widely used vaccines. We describe how the glyphosate residue contained in vaccines might induce the kind of autoimmune responses typically observed in autism.

Interestingly, of all the vaccines we tested, MMR stood out as consistently having the highest level of glyphosate contamination. This fact may help explain why the MMR vaccine, which contains neither mercury nor aluminum, has been implicated so often in vaccine injury and autism.”

It appears many ingredients may be being redefined as incidental contaminants.  It also seems that incidental contaminants are being wiped off the “Vaccine Excipients'” map [list].

Pediatricians can make millions forcing these liability-free products on our children.

These shots cannot be physically tolerated by at least 1/5th of the population.  The evidence is clear—70% of adults and 53% of children are now chronically ill.  In a country that boasts itself as having the best medical system in the world, how can this be?  How much are these shots contributing to this fact?

There are gene variants on the mitochondrial DNA that make these shots toxic to many of us.  There is a test, but doctors won’t do it.  It is far too lucrative to give the shots, and doctors risk no liability.

In addition, many pharmaceutical products contain these toxicants.  I cannot take many of them.  I can trace many disturbing events in my life back to my consumption of such prescribed products.  I assume the same is true for my fellow-injured.  Yet the medical-industrial complex uses the very laws created to protect us to force them on us.

I have been made critically ill and my children were damaged by these shots.  Two vaccines my sons received were pulled off the market after a time because they were causing too much damage.   Companies were being sued too much.  There are now millions of injured.

And no one called me to discover whether my sons are okay.  They aren’t.

A woman by the name of Dorit Reiss (a huge spokesperson for vaccines) has said that it would be possible, yet challenging, to have the police go from door to door to force these shots on people.  Where have our freedoms gone?  What has happened to our country?  How can it be possible that a liability-free product can incur governmental mandates as if it is a marketing arm of the pharmaceutical industry?  How is it possible that we can be made pharmaceutical customers for life through these mandates?

How far down the rabbit hole will we go?

Our critical checks and balances are gone.  We are at the mercy of our government and its mandates.

The days of Harry Evans are over.  Vaccines are our new thalidomide, and there is no one left to expose this.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: