Five years in jail and/or $880,00 in fines for providing any information required for informed consent to COVID vaccine recipients.
Will subjects be required to sign consent forms without being told of the dangers?
I seriously have to laugh at their claims of effectiveness and the like. Studies, these days, are jokes and have been for some time. I just told someone [who might recognize this] of a time I was in a double-blind study. A double-blind study is when a product tested and neither the tester nor the subject knows what’s given when.
In a conversation with a body a few days ago, I said this:
“I’ve run a study or two—not much and participated in one double-blind study myself.
The study I participated in was a double-blind amphetamine study. One time I was to get the placebo and the other, the amphetamine. To give you an idea of how shoddily studies are run, I was given the pill each time and hooked up to a monitor. I noticed right of the bat both the tester and I had a clear view of a heart-rate monitor. In all likelihood, my heart rate would elevate when I received the amphetamine. I mentioned this to the tester—I was rather agitated about it—and the tester said they hooked me to the monitor to ensure my safety.
So the first time I got the placebo, and the second time I got the amphetamine—my accelerated heart rate proved it. I couldn’t see how the study was valid at all because the tester and I both knew what was when.”
I’m sure my data was included in this study which was flawed from the start. When it comes to science, unless there is strict supervision, children will play with their toys.
- The study I participated in was at the supposedly prestigious NIH.
- And the tester—who was an MD—went on to work for a pharmaceutical company. Good fit—dontcha think?
VACCINATED AT 11AM, DEAD BY 1:54PM: CDC DOCUMENTATION by Rangitikei Health Watch
The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Results